Had someone asked me five years ago to describe the organic
food industry, I would have placed organic food production somewhere on the
fringe. I knew of consumers who believed organic food was healthier than
conventional food. These consumers are willing to pay a premium for organically
grown food and are complemented by farmers who grow food organically. These
organic growers need the organic price premium in order to compensate for lower
yields. Everyone is happy.
But not everyone, really. Anyone prepared to take a critical
look at conventional agriculture, has always been concerned about the
vulnerability of that production system because of its dependence on scarce and
exotic chemicals; scarce in that phosphate and nitrogen as inputs are
non-renewable resources, and exotic because chemicals are carefully developed
in order to address a defined problem under defined conditions. The understanding
of how these exotic chemicals work and of their side effects is limited.
The above thoughts should really not be new to anyone. What
follows may surprise you.
In February, I attended the first ever Canadian Organic
Science Conference in Winnipeg .
The conference was fascinating in many respects, but what struck me most was
the growing awareness by the conference attendees that organic food production
is able to compete with conventional food production on its own terms: that is,
organic food producers are poised to compete in the same market place with
conventional food producers.
The Rhodale Institute in Pennsylvania has been a leader in the research,
development and promotion of organic food production methods since 1947. They
have been running a farming systems trial for 30 years comparing conventional
and organic farming systems. The Institute has recently published a report
thirty years into the study. They have found that:
- Organic yields match conventional yields
- Organic outperforms conventional in years of drought
- Organic systems build rather than deplete soil organic matter, making it a more sustainable system
- Organic farming uses 45% less energy
- Organic systems produce 60% of the greenhouse gases a conventional system does
- Organic farming systems are more profitable than conventional
Organic food production is not simply the elimination of
chemicals in the growing of food. An organic producer told me recently, that a
conventional farmer monitors his field, and when he detects a problem, he goes
to his agricultural input supplier, buys the appropriate chemical and applies
it. An organic producer, on the other hand, needs to be aware of the problems
he is likely to encounter two or three years earlier, and begin to deal with
them then. Organic production requires an understanding of the biological
systems at work in the field or garden, and a familiarity with the wide array
of tools now available to the organic grower.
Nobody said organic food production is easy, but as fuel
prices go up and weeds and insects develop chemical resistance, more and more
of us will need to embrace organic food production.
Eric Rempel
No comments:
Post a Comment